Kill the wrong sites early. Advance the one that earns the spend.
For development teams deciding where the next diligence dollar goes. Give us an address, a parcel, or the boundary you draw. Within 24 hours you get a source-cited site memo — advance, monitor, hold, or kill. Whether the next $50K–$260K of per-site diligence — counsel, civil, utility, consultants — is worth spending, answered before you spend it.
The cheap no belongs before the expensive maybe.
Create your workspace and submit your first site.
Request a site memo SEND ONE SITE — WE RUN IT AND DELIVER THE MEMO
How that document gets made. One research run, start to finish.
1.Three fields — where, what, how big — plus an optional parcel. Scale is vertical-specific: megawatts for a data center, units for multifamily, square feet for retail.
2.A jurisdiction we haven't deep-mapped yet is never rejected — an unmatched address triggers its own dedicated research run before the memo is written.
3.The citation gate is mechanical: a claim without a cited source is blocked from delivery, and a failed check on a claim the recommendation depends on blocks the whole memo.
4.The recommendation is computed from the cited risk register, with a guard that keeps the score and the recommendation consistent.
✳ analyst's note — power adjacency is not power availability; the memo hands that question to the utility, on the record.
“You give us a site. We read the public record. Within 24 hours you get a memo with a recommendation — and every claim carries its source. A memo that can't, doesn't ship.”
Your Loudoun site and your Phoenix site: read the same way, to the same standard, every time. The screening read that costs your team days per candidate — delivered as a document, with the sources attached.
An address becomes a site.
The run begins in the public record — the rules, the hearings, and the history that already act on this land.
Four words. Read the band, not the number.
Advance · Monitor · Hold · Kill. One of these four words leads every memo.
A memo that cannot stand behind its recommendation doesn't ship. Before delivery, every persisted claim is checked against its cited source. Load-bearing failures are held or removed.
The recommendation is never written first and justified after.
The memo is the deliverable. The workspace is where it lives.
the recommendation is the answer
47 source documents on file · 4 risk questions answered. Every tab below is scoped to this site — and every line in it carries its source.
the recommendation is the answer
The parcel sits inside a discretionary CUP district — a conditional-use permit path, not by-right.
Within the district, the following uses are permitted only upon approval of a conditional-use permit by the planning commission after public hearing:
Data center, where the gross floor area exceeds the by-right threshold established in the use table, subject to the additional standards of this section.
Uses not listed as permitted or conditional are prohibited.
Every claim in the memo cites into this shelf. A document your counsel wants to check is one click away — not a request ticket.
220+ hand-researched entitlement fights — withdrawals, denials, and reversals with the paper to prove it — ranked against this site's use, scale, and jurisdiction posture.
Give us one address. We'll show you the record behind it — and where every line came from.
1,350 of the country's roughly 19,000 permitting jurisdictions deeply mapped — and growing. The references are the reading inside the documents — passages of zoning codes, staff reports, hearing minutes, and utility filings, each one pointing back into a source document on file.
Every U.S. site is researchable. All 50 states are covered at the state and federal layer, and a jurisdiction we haven't deep-mapped yet gets its own dedicated research run the moment you submit a site there — and what that run reads stays in the library, for every site after it.
These aren't hypotheticals. They're withdrawals, denials, and reversals that already happened — data centers, multifamily, and the asset classes that follow them — with the paper to prove it. In one drive-thru corridor in Meridian, Idaho, the record held more than 300 written submissions before the vote. That's not a surprise you want on hearing night.
In one 96-unit multifamily fight in Woodbridge, Connecticut, 150-plus residents opposed on the record — and a month after approval, the commission rewrote the zoning underneath the next applicant. The record doesn't stop moving when the vote ends. Browse 220+ case files →
The parcel layer. It helps connect a site to jurisdictions, local documents, comparable outcomes, and the approval record around it.
The record shows what acts on the land.
Rail, power, water, neighbors, ordinance — every constraint is read from a source document your counsel can check.
Five questions every site must answer. Cited inside every run.
Each question retired at screening is a line item you don't pay to rediscover mid-diligence — priced below.
What the approval path does to the pro forma.
Franklin Township, priced: by withdrawal — 183 days after filing — the sunk cost spanned land assembly across roughly 470 acres, partner-rate attorney fees, and roughly a year of senior-team time from first assembly to walk-away, on a path the public record had flagged as steep from the start.
✳ analyst's note — the arithmetic is not the recommendation; it is why the recommendation is worth reading.
Every finding has a clock and a cost.
Found at screening, a finding costs a memo. Found at the hearing, it costs the year.
It looks like a search box. It works like a research system.
A chat window answers from memory. RealClear answers from the record.
A zoning reader, a pathway mapper, a community sentinel, a comparable analyst, and a report writer work the record at once, with live research from the open web.
Every assertion must name a source document before it leaves the building — bound, in the database, to the exact source it came from. A claim without a citation isn't softened — it's blocked.
Underneath sits a knowledge graph — a living map of the record, cross-referenced so the same ordinance, staff report, or filing is findable from every site it touches. Every run deepens it.
Advance, Monitor, Hold, or Kill — and every reason behind it opens to its source.
Start with an address, a parcel number — or draw the boundary yourself. The research reads the record either way.
Whether the next diligence dollar is worth spending — a cited site memo within 24 hours.
A chat window can sound certain. It can't hand you the source. The difference isn't a better answer — it's an answer your counsel can check.
Unknowns are held. Never guessed.
Where the record is silent, the memo says so — a documented unknown, not a confident guess.