Kill the wrong sites early. Advance the one that earns the spend.
Give us the site — an address, a parcel, or the boundary you draw. Within 24 hours you get a site memo — advance, monitor, hold, or kill — and every claim in it carries its source. The $50,000-to-$260,000 question, answered before you spend it.
The cheap no belongs before the expensive maybe.
Your first cited site memo within 24 hours.
How that document gets made. One research run, start to finish.
1.Three fields — where, what, how big — plus an optional parcel. Scale is vertical-specific: megawatts for a data center, units for multifamily, square feet for retail.
2.A jurisdiction we haven't deep-mapped yet is never rejected — an unmatched address triggers its own dedicated research run before the memo is written.
3.The citation gate is mechanical: a claim without a cited source is blocked from delivery, and a failed check on a claim the recommendation depends on blocks the whole memo.
4.The recommendation is computed from the cited risk register, with a guard that keeps the score and the recommendation consistent — it is never written first and justified after.
✳ analyst's note — power adjacency is not power availability; the memo hands that question to the utility, on the record.
“You give us a site. We read the public record. Within 24 hours you get a memo with a recommendation — and every claim carries its source.”
The memo is the deliverable. The workspace is where it lives.
the recommendation is the answer
47 source documents on file · 4 risk questions answered · 2 watch events since delivery. Every tab below is scoped to this site — and every line in it carries its source.
the recommendation is the answer
The parcel sits inside a discretionary CUP district — a conditional-use permit path, not by-right.
Every claim in the memo cites into this shelf. A document your counsel wants to check is one click away — not a request ticket.
220+ hand-researched entitlement fights — withdrawals, denials, and reversals with the paper to prove it — ranked against this site's use, scale, and jurisdiction posture.
Give us one address. We'll show you the record behind it — and where every line came from.
1,347 jurisdictions deeply mapped — and growing every week. Every U.S. site is researchable: all 50 states are covered at the state and federal layer, and a jurisdiction we haven't deep-mapped yet gets its own dedicated research run the moment you submit a site there.
These aren't hypotheticals. They're withdrawals, denials, and reversals that already happened — with the paper to prove it. In one Meridian corridor, the record held more than 300 written submissions before the vote. That's not a surprise you want on hearing night. Browse 220+ case files →
Four words. Read the band, not the number.
A memo that cannot stand behind its recommendation is held, not shipped. Missing controlling evidence, an uncited claim, a failed check on a claim the recommendation depends on — any one of them stops delivery.
Five cited decision questions, asked inside every run.
What the approval path does to the pro forma.
Franklin Township, priced: by withdrawal, the sunk cost spanned land assembly across 467.66 acres, partner-rate attorney fees, and roughly a year of a senior development team — on a path the public record had flagged as steep from the start.
✳ analyst's note — the arithmetic is not the recommendation; it is why the recommendation is worth reading.
It looks like a search box. It works like a research system.
A chat window answers from memory. RealClear answers from the record.
Start with an address, a parcel number — or draw the boundary yourself. The research reads the record either way.
A zoning reader, a pathway mapper, a community sentinel, a comparable analyst, and a report writer work the record at once, with live research from the open web. Your Loudoun site and your Phoenix site: read the same way, to the same standard, every time.
Every assertion must name a source document before it leaves the building. A claim without a citation isn't softened — it's held. Click any sentence back to the ordinance, the staff report, the meeting record.
Underneath sits a knowledge graph — a living map of the record: 2,000,000+ references across 390,000+ source documents and 1,347 jurisdictions, cross-referenced so a change in one place surfaces everywhere it matters. It grows every week.
Advance, Monitor, Hold, or Kill — and every reason behind it opens to its source.
The diligence you'd have paid six figures for — a cited site memo within 24 hours.
A chat window can sound certain. It can't hand you the source. The difference isn't a better answer — it's an answer your counsel can check.
The record keeps moving. We keep watching it.
Delivery isn't the end. Watch rules keep reading the record — scoped to the sources your memo actually used — and flag what moves under your site.
Your first cited site memo within 24 hours.
You brought a site. We brought the record — cited, gated, and ready for committee. Know the approval risks before counsel, utilities, and consultants start billing.
Bet capital on what the record says. Not on what a model remembers.